Research Presentation Rubric
|
criteria
|
less
than adequate
|
adequate
|
good
|
very
good
|
excellent
|
| made sure key points were identified and understood |
limited or inaccurate identification of key points |
|
most of class came away understanding most of the key points in the article |
|
key
points were accurately identified and sufficiently explored
|
| used vocabulary accurately |
rarely
|
|
mostly
|
|
always
|
| clearly worded guiding questions |
difficulty
understanding your guiding questions
|
|
fairly
clear questions
|
|
guiding
questions were easy to follow
|
| guiding questions built on each other effectively | no logical flow to questions | some logical flow to the questions | initial questions help set up those questions that followed, and helped build understanding of the research | ||
| engaged the audience |
class
was bored
|
|
class
was engaged for some of the discussion
|
|
class
was engaged through most of the discussion
|
| helped make connections |
little
help in making connnections
|
|
meaningfully
helped class make connections between article and real world or previous
ideas/research
|
||
| answered questions effectively |
no
|
|
sometimes
|
|
usually
|