new link as of February 1, 2014
broken links here
Activities and Exercises
Similarity Project - In one version of this activity, starting
in groups of four, students are asked to identify as many similarities
as they can between their different groups. Then they join larger
and larger groups to see if they can identify even more similarities.
a Facebook game - Dan Ariely has created a Facebook activity
that he can use as a research tool and your students can use to
learn about different social psychological phenomena. Of course,
none of your students may be on Facebook... [added
your own faces - cool, online program in which you get to
manipulate facial features [added 12/4/10]
analysis - Here is an activity from Jessica Collett's Social
Psychology course in which students analyze possible conversations
they might have. Here
is some background info on conversational structure. [added
Pairing Game - From
the following source comes this in-class activity to illustrate
the matching phenomenon:
Bruce J; Kelley, Harold H. (1999). The pairing game: A classroom
demonstration of the matching phenomenon. Teaching of Psychology,
26, 118-121. Abstract: Describes 2 versions of an in-class simulation
that allows students to directly experience the matching phenomenon
and explore issues concerning mate selection, social exchange,
and related psychological concepts. Students are randomly assigned
a value (either a numerical value or a list of adjectives), which
they place on their forehead so others can see it but the student
cannot. The goal is to pair off with another student with as high
a value as possible. The simulation, called the Pairing Game,
illustrates how matching on similarity can occur, even in the
absence of knowledge of one's own value and merely by seeking
the highest value possible in a partner.
Friedrich reports that he uses this activity and adds: "I simply
have my pairs that have emerged from the game arbitrarily designate
a "Partner A" and a "Partner B"; then each pair gets to plot their
coordinates with Partner A on the X asis and Partner B on the
Y. There's always a very nice scatterplot, as the demo itself
produces pretty good matching. Even medium size correlations of
r = .5 tend to look pretty vague in small-N scatterplots, but
the patterns jump right out whenever I do this (with or without
the actual statstistical calculation)." He adds: "The article
mentioned might go nicely with a recent finding reported in the
Journal of Family Psychology (I believe) showing that heterosexual
relationships in which the man is slightly less attractive than
the woman exhibit better interpersonal relationships. The interpretation
- or at last one of them - is that one of the things that less
attractive men offer to attract more attractive woman with a broader
range of choices is greater attentiveness, willingness to listen,
etc. I've only read a summary and haven't been able to get the
original yet, so don't quote me on this. For a more formal and
comprehensive treatment of using market and economic principles
in an attempt to understand key elements of heterosexual relationships,
I regularly assign the following article by Roy Baumeister and
Kathleen Vohs. [Baumeister, Roy F; Vohs, Kathleen D. (2004). Sexual
Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual
Interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339-363.]
It always generates lots of reactions (ranging from amused to
heated) and provides a good opportunity for talking about what
one looks for or doesn't in good theory -- ability to parsimoniously
explain a range of existing phenomena, ability to generate new
testable predictions, use of principles that are "independently
motivated" (developed for purposes other than for explaining the
phenomena in question), etc. It also provides opportunities to
talk about things like naturalistic fallacy errors and the temptation
to evaluate psychological theories (provisional and testable descriptions
of nature) by the way they make us feel or the social ends they
might or might not serve." Here's
a link to a related article. [added 5/3/08]
an "average" face - Interesting site lets you create an average
face from images provided. The site also explains how these average
faces are created. "You can also average your own uploaded faces!"
fun with faces - "Morph your picture!" "Find out which celebrities
you resemble!" Tells you how it works. [added 4/4/08]
more fun with faces - Robin Musselman used the "Human Race
Machine" as part of a class to, well, I'll let Robin tell it:
"I try to think of an overarching theme each semester. In this
particular semester it was the fall after the first face transplant
and somewhere I had read something that this was a procedure that
could have been done previously, but hadn't because of the significance
of the face to individual's psyche. It really got me thinking
and so I decided to use the face as a theme that fall.
don't necessarily tell students....here is the theme, but I try
to interweave it throughout the semester. That same semester I
was using wikis for the first time so the first day of class I
took everyone's picture and then created a Who's Who in Psychology
page with each class have an individual page for each student.
I posted their first name and picture and then they could create
from there. Introduce themselves to the class, if you will, and
they continued to add to those pages throughout the semester.
I gave students the right to remove their picture if they wanted
to, but I think only one or two out of 120 did so.
talked about face recognition in the brain section, perception
allowed for some unique illusions with face symmetery and other
facial illusions, in learning and memory we talked about remembering
names and/or faces, we talked about facial _expression_, the baby's
innate fascination of faces, culture and beauty, I can't remember
all of the little and not so little tie ins off the top of my
head. I used the film Faces (with John Cleese) and the books,
The Autobiography of the face, and another book (not the companion
to the video Faces) The Face, which was a great resource. About
2/3 into the semester I had arranged for the Human Race Machine
to come onto campus for a week and students could transform their
faces into another race as well as age themselves 20 years. Students
really were fascinated by this (I had seen it at a museum in Maryland....for
info see, http://www.humanracemachine.com/faq.html
the end of the semester we used the facial recognition software
and many students posted those images that were "supposed" to
look like them on their wiki pages. Again, students really enjoyed
it and in fact, I had promised that three weeks after the semester
I would "take down" the wiki pages with student pictures, etc.
and then I had several students contact me asking if I still had
their pages so they could transfer them to another site. All in
all it was a fun semester." [added
activity - Jean Mandernach sends her students to participate
in an online experiment and then answer some questions about it.
Filter - fun site where one can morph a face to fit several
emotional responses and types of attractiveness [added
exposure effect [added
Resources (Audio / Video)
shame and seeking forgiveness" - apodcast from Science
of Relationships [added 2/18/14]
Matters Podcast Series - Listen to experts in their fields discuss
their work -- affiliated with the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
secret of pronouns - NPR interviews James Pennebaker about his
fascinating research on the use of pronouns and their relationship
to dating. [added
I Normal (Sexually)? - interesting, 30-minute episode in BBC radio's
Am I Normal series [added
we don't want to be alone - (2:49) [added
first date - (2:44)
Fun video. Maybe you can ask your students if they have been the
giver or receiver of such persistence? How would they respond? [added
love - (41:35) presentation
by Elaine Hatfield at the 2012 APS convention [added
amusing ad - (0:45)
That's all I can say. I don't want to give it away. Like some people.
creates dramatic ad for marriage equality - (3:20)
your soulmate isn't that special (mathematically, that is) -
(3:59) A great song by
Tim Minchin -- thank you Science of Relationships (http://www.scienceofrelationships.com/)
for making me aware of it! [added
Parties! - (4:22)
This story from the Science of Relationships includes a
video clip from the Colbert Report describing a dating
fad: Attending pheromone parties. [added
in a backward world" - (5:01)
for your entertainment [added
male/female roles in relationships - amusing video - in two
parts [added 6/25/12]
date = sex? - (1:44)
A clip from the show The Big Bang Theory raises the question
of whether "the idea that the third date is the 'sex date,' the
date when it is deemed appropriate for a new couple to have sex"
is a social norm or just a myth. [added
and loss aversion - (4:21)
Steven Neuberg and his colleagues Yexin Jessica Li and Douglas Kenrick
"discuss their research on how evolutionary motives such as mating
and self-protection influence individuals' sensitivity to loss aversion."
and relationships - (2:47)
Psychologist discusses research on our heavy consumption of technology
and its link to relationship happiness/success. When you are done
reading this issue at your computer or phone make sure that you
go share it with a partner or kid or Juggalo. [added
and irrationality - (6:01)
Dan Ariely discusses decision making in the dating scene. Here
- (5:28) is a second video
on the topic. [added
is French kissing called in France? - (1:52)
Here's a cute little video montage of kissing accompanied by some
facts including the answer to the above question. [added
spousal conflict impair the immune system? - (6:14)
video and text describing an interesting study testing this question
retouching - (2:29)
This video illustrates how many of the images we see are often modified
to eliminate blemishes and make more appealing. [added
online dating is so unsatisfying - (7:41)
Watch an interview with Dan Ariely discussing the topic. [added
in Japan - (9:35)
This form of social isolation, Hikikomori, in which, typically,
young boys and men lock themselves in their rooms for years in some
cases, appears to be fairly unique to Japan. This link takes you
to Part 1 of the video. You can find Part 2 on the video page. [added
- (3:54) That's physical
proximity to you young whippersnappers. Here's a song ("Somebody")
from Reba McEntire that captures well our tendency to choose from
those nearby. [added
and Relationships - Now that the excellent Science of Relationships
site has been around a bit (at least in Internet time), it has accumulated
a number of good resources for teaching. The site creators have graciously
compiled some of those resources and assignments at the link above.
of attractiveness - Ever seen any of those "Am I hot or not" sites?
Here is a long list of them that perhaps you or your students can
use in some project. [added 1/10/06]
a play - Chuck Huff asks his students to view three plays during
his Social Psychology course: Macbeth (two versions) and A Streetcar
Named Desire. Then he asks them to analyze the plays in terms of how
close relationships are portrayed.
from an Intimate Relationships course - Gary Lewandowski lets
students choose from a variety of assignments including comparing
popular press claims versus the research and creating a "how to" guide
for relationship success. [added 3/1/05]
exposure effect [added
Factors - Seinfeld Episode: Evolutionary factors in mate selection
can be seen in the episode in which they try to fix up George with
a date. He asks questions about his potential date's physical attributes
and she asks questions about George's status, power and resources.
Contributed by Steve Fein. [added 4/28/02]
attractiveness - Physical attractiveness plays a big role
in how we think of and respond to people. I've worked as a summer
camp counselor for the past two years and you have to try and treat
each kid the same but it is inevitable that you will have favorites.
I remember one year there were two really bad kids in particular who
were always getting into trouble. One was a little girl who was so
cute. She always had a cute little outfit on, here little ears were
pierced, and was hilarious. But she was always getting herself into
trouble or not listening. The other kid was a little overweight and
not so attractive boy who also knew just how to muster up trouble.
But when it came to punishing the two it was hard to be equal and
fair and generally what tended to happen is the cute girl would get
away with a lot more. She could somehow get us to forget or be less
mad about the trouble she had caused and distract us with her humor
or by other tactics. And the little boy would often get in more trouble
and get a lot less positive attention....Thinking back, my favorite
kids have never really been unattractive, and I even feel horrible
admitting that, but it's true. [added 4/16/08]
Attractiveness - Something funny came to mind while I was looking
over the section on physical attractiveness. Specifically, I was looking
at the idea that attractive children are given the benefit of the
doubt more often than less attractive children. This is so true!
I work with two three-year-old boys that can look at me with their
respective sets of baby blues and browns and melt me to the ground.
It is so difficult to discipline a child that looks so cute when they
look at you. In these situations, I consciously have to think about
what I'm doing in order to discipline the gorgeous kids the same way
I treat the other children.
Attractiveness - North Central College uses the "attractive"
idea to persuade people to attend the college. While going to class
on a couple of days, I remember seeing a photographer on campus taking
pictures of two or three attractive young students. I instantly thought
of the course catalogue. The young people on the cover will help emphasize
the stereotype of the student's physical appearance: happy,
intelligent, kind, sociable and successful.
(physical proximity)...again! - another good example -- a spoof from
The Onion -- hat tip to Jeff Ricker for this one [added
- Here's a song ("Somebody") from Reba McEntire that captures well
our tendency to choose from those nearby. [added 12/12/07]
(Physical Proximity) - When we discussed the idea that we make
friends with those close to us this made me think of the floor that
I live on now. Last year when we saw who was going to live on our
floor we were very upset. Our end of the hall was all football players
but the other end was all soccer players. Normally football hates
soccer. At first things were a little tense but after a while some
friendships developed. Because they were close it was easy to see
if they wanted to go eat or go out or something and we found out they
aren't as bad as we thought. If they didn't live close we would probably
hate them still.
-- there's a common source of argument. Does one person doing garbage
equate to the other ironing? Does one person doing laundry equate
to the other vacuuming? Early on in our marriage these issues cropped
up frequently. Now as I look at it, 16 years later, these just aren't
issues anymore. Each does what has to be done as it needs doing. Sometimes
one of us has more time than the other. Consideration of the other's
needs creates the equity anymore -- not the amount of equal effort.
That's where the twist builds from because you know the other person
will be there for you.
- When we first married, I worked full-time while my husband finished
college (before my liberated days). This was out of concern for his
and our welfare. I did not expect anything in return. Now sixteen
years and a family later, I am going to finish school. It is not easy.
My personality takes a real nose dive during semesters. My energy
level is good for squat. My husband does 75% of the housework. (The
other 25% doesn't get done.) My level of patience will never get me
a mother-of-the-year award. Yet in one of my reflective, depressive
moods last year, I asked my husband why he put up with it. His response
was "you put me through school years ago; it's the least I can do
now." That is love.
liked face-to-face are also liked online - [added
world research on instant messaging - Answer: 6.6 degrees of separation
paradox of poygamy - "Contrary to popular belief, most women benefit
from polygynous society, and most men benefit from monogamous society.
This is because polygynous society allows some women to share a resourceful
man of high status." [added
smells and likeability - story of research finding that in humans
consciously undetectable odors alter social preferences [added
is the way we connect - an article about research on the role
laughter plays in our social world [added 11/17/07]
nude pictures focus attention" - research interpreted to suggest
an evolutionary benefit for attending to sexual stimuli [added
buddies: Do animals have friends?" - an intriguing question and
article from ScienceNews [added 6/9/04]
relationships cartoon - Ahh, propinquity. [added
miraculously finds soulmate in hometown" - an amusing article
from the satirical online newspaper The Onion -- ahh, propinquity!
attract, but do they last?" - The answer is what I tell my students
to write on psych exams if they have no clue to the answer: It depends!
In this case the research suggests that it depends on the partners'
levels of self-control. [added 8/5/13]
music tastes indicate similar values which foretells attraction
rather than conscious, evaluations good predictors of marriage satisfaction
- Or as the author of this article, Ben Le, states, "our unconscious
feelings about our partners might be the Magic 8-Ball when it comes
to future marriage satisfaction." [added 2/18/14]
you want a happy or sad breakup song? - After a non-interpersonal
loss people prefer listening to happy music, but prefer sad music
after an interpersonal loss. [added 8/5/13]
science behind 3 popular dating apps" - [added
the sexual double standard? - Interesting discussion of why promiscuous
men are studs while promiscuous women are sluts [added
+ Timing = Relationship Success" - a good discussion of these
elements in a Science of Relationships blog entry [added
humor - [added 8/5/13]
husbands provide sensitive support - ... it benefits the relationship
and relationships - Don't know yet what "catfishing" is? Read
all about it in this blog entry. [added 8/5/13]
ways to improve your relationship - A good infographic summarizing
research on the topic -- clicking on the image takes you to an article
that elaborates on it. Surprisingly, "don't get catfished" is not
one of the seven. [added 8/5/13]
love literally hurts" - an APS Observer article looking
at the neural link between social and physical pain [added
implicit processes tell us about romantic attachment" - another
good APS Observer article [added 8/5/13]
humor - more
here - When I want my dose of relationship humor I always turn
to Science of Relationships. Unlike relationships, it never
disappoints. [added 8/5/13]
makes a "jealous type"? - good blog entry on jealousy [added
drum-off - interesting little video of some relationship conversation
through drumming [added 8/5/13]
love - interesting New York Times article on the research
of new love [added 8/5/13]
do we offer versus request support? - Casual friends offer support;
close friends offer and request support. [added 8/5/13]
non-monogamy - [added 8/5/13]
dating - Review research about dealing with all the choices [added
gift giving undermine relationships? - [added 1/12/13]
did not evolve for romance" [added 1/12/13]
we like funny in possible mates? - good discussion of some research
on what men and women find attractive in the opposite sex in terms
of humor [added
over for "muffins" - Ahh, what did we do before Science of
Relationships? [added 1/12/13]
relationship humor - and more,
- from Science of Relationships [added 1/12/13]
of matching between partners predicts divorce" - [added
to make "couples friends" - Here's an interesting blog entry about
how couples can improve the quality of their life and their relationship
if they find other couples with which to be friends. [added
little relationship humor - Along with thoughtful and interesting
blog entries like the above, Science of Relationships also throws
in a good does of relationship humor as well. Just like any good relationship
a little more humor. [added
"cracked" relationship advice - For your amusement, possibly.
watching The Bachelorette bad for your relationship?" - interesting
blog post from Science of Relationships [added
says 'I love you' first in a relationship?" - [added
humor - Okay, I found it amusing. [added
cohabitation detrimental to marriage? - Dylan Selterman, at Science
of Relationships, provides a nice review of the controversy and what
the research actually says. [added
power of hello" - Sam Sommers makes a good case for the simple
acts of smiling and saying "hello." [added
Day humor - [added
style predicts relationship longevity" - "Recently, researchers
have found that similarity in communication patterns predicts mutual
romantic interest and relationship stability 3 months down the road.
And we’re not even talking about similar use of big fancy words.
Rather, it’s the small words that we would generally consider
“fillers”, such as pronouns (I, her, that), articles (a,
an, the), conjunctions (and, but, because), and the like that matter.
In what researchers call “language style matching’”
(or LSM, for short), individuals’ conversations may begin to
subtly become synchronous. Sometimes our conversations are high in
LSM, which means there is a lot of matching in language use, whereas
other conversations are low in LSM, which means we are speaking to
one another in quite different styles. In the researchers’ first
study, 40 speed-dating couples had their 4-minute interaction recorded,
and transcriptions of these interactions were entered into a language
analysis computer program. Couples who had higher LSM (again, they
matched in their use of pronouns, articles, conjunctions, etc.) were
more likely to show mutual romantic interest in one another. This
effect was not due to the total number of words being spoken in the
conversation (that is, it’s not because two “Chatty Cathys”
were paired up and talking each other’s ears off)." [added
vs. Time in relationships - another good cartoon/graph [added
committed couples use more plural nouns - Warning: Scary picture.
and relationship violence - Another good blog entry from the Science
of Relationships site -- what effect might all these teenage vampire
movies/shows/stories have on relationship abuse? [added
you date a Democrat/Republican/Libertarian...? [added
style and long-lasting relationships - Does a more secure attachment
style lead to better success in maintaining long-term relationships?
Like relationships themselves, it's complicated. [added
15 sources of conflict in relationships - From the excellent blog
Science of Relationships, created by Ben Le, Gary Lewandowski, and
Tim Loving. That's right, Dr. Loving. [added
equation: half your age + 7 years - "A common rule of thumb, at
least on the internet, is that it’s okay to be interested in
someone 'half your age plus seven' years. According to this rule,
it would not be creepy for a 30 year old to date a 22 year-old, but
an 18 year-old would be off-limits. Although this is a fun rule of
thumb, what does research say about age preferences for potential
to downers - "Have you ever wanted to share good news with friends
but were afraid they would rain on your parade because they’re
downers? Researchers recently discovered that people avoid disclosing
positive information to low self-esteem friends and romantic partners
in order to avoid a negative interaction (e.g., the 'downer' pointing
out the downside). Interestingly, we don’t keep the good news
to ourselves to protect our close others’ feelings – we
primarily focus on our own outcomes!" [added
is blind. Your friends aren't." - Blog entry describes research
on whether you can predict your own relationship's breakup better
than your friends can. [added
is abstract, but sex is concrete" - Here is some interesting research
on how generating abstract versus concrete construals can affect how
we think about relationships. If you have some difficulty explaining
the concept of construals to your students, this example provides
a nice way of describing the concept. [added
complicated psychology of revenge" - from the APS Observer
humor! - Some amusing cartoons found at the excellent blog Science
of Relationships; a second
one, and a third.
romantic U.S. city? - I always like to see interesting ways of
measuring things. Most romantic city? The one that rented the highest
percentage of romantic comedies through Redbox (a kiosk often located
in front of or inside stores from which someone can rent a movie).
Follow the link to find out if it is your city... [added
and attraction - "A recent study indicates that men are more likely
than women to use humor when getting to know potential romantic partners,
and that women use sense of humor as a criteria for evaluating partners
more than men. In addition, when analyzing online personal ads, researchers
found that men tended to mention their own sense of humor, while women
stated a preference for a funny partner. Finally, a woman’s
rating of a man’s sense of humor predicts her romantic interest
in him. However, a man's perception of a woman’s sense of humor
is unimportant for his desire to get to know her." [added
couple good relationship cartoons - first
one - I added the new site Science
of Relationships to the front page of this site. The site has
already produced a lot of good blog entries commenting on the topic.
They also occasionally include some good cartoons like those above.
the men of the African Aka tribe the best fathers in the world?"
- [added 5/30/11]
study of smiling - very interesting story in the APS Observer
on the many facets of smiling research and what it all means [added
is worse.... - your partner having a heterosexual or a homosexual
affair?" Men and women answer differently. [added 12/24/10]
"invisible" support to a loved one - "Recipients whose partners
provided more invisible emotional support such as reassurance or expressions
of concern, but believed they had received less emotional support,
experienced greater declines in anger and anxiety. This was also true
for invisible practical support such as advice or direct offers of
assistance. Additionally, in the case of invisible practical support,
recipients experienced increases in self-efficacy." [added
dating - This blog entry provides a good compilation of research
on online dating. [added 10/30/10]
songs make women more open to dates" - [added 7/21/10]
romance? Show a little gratitude" - Men and, particularly, women
were less likely to break up with someone who had showed small acts
of gratitude. However, no manipulation occurred, so is the above headline
infidelity - "Research has documented that most men become much
more jealous about sexual infidelity than they do about emotional
infidelity. Women are the opposite, and this is true all over the
world." The prevailing theory is an evolutionary one: "Men learned
over eons to be hyper-vigilant about sex because they can never be
absolutely certain they are the father of a child, while women are
much more concerned about having a partner who is committed to raising
a family." This new research, however, suggests a different explanation.
during speed dating - "Women hoping to appeal to speed-dating
partners should try subtly mimicking the words and body-language of
their dates. That's according to Nicholas Gueguen whose new study
shows that women who mimic are rated by men as more sexually attractive."
falling in love make us more creative?" - "A new study demonstrates
that thinking about love--but not about sex--causes us to think more
'globally,' making it easier to come up with new ideas." [added
states of marriage and divorce" - This Pew Research Center report
is a state-by-state analysis of the current status of marriage and
divorce. [added 1/18/10]
apart together" - In other words, you are in a relationship, but
you don't live with the person. "We use two surveys to describe the
demographic and attitudinal correlates of being in "Living Apart Together"
(LAT), cohabiting, and marital relationships for heterosexuals, lesbians,
and gay men." [added 1/18/10]
is the new handshake - Interesting New York Times article
describes an apparent trend in which teenagers regular hug each other
as greetings, including between males. [added
dating - good article describing how the phenomenon of speed dating
has provided a wealth of opportunities for research [added
celebrities can help improve self-esteem" - What? Yes, this study
found that engaging in these "fake" relationships with celebrities
(called parasocial relationships) can benefit those with low self-esteem.
dating - interesting blog entry about how online dating has been
frustrating, leading to some new approaches [added
of healthy adult marriages? - A report from the Rand Corporation
looks at adolescent romantic relationships as precursors of healthy
adult marriages. [added 12/1/07]
female dolls for men - "Thousands of men are shelling out $6,500
for hyper-realistic dolls that answer all their needs -- and don't
talk back." No mention in the article of women buying men dolls. What
would a male doll that answered all of women's needs be like? [added
hidden purpose of chat-up lines" - Why do men use pick-up lines?
One study investigates that "chat-up lines may be a way for men to
select for a particular type of woman." [10/13/07]
social regulation of emotion - In the latest issue of the APS
Observer, there were a number of excellent articles reporting on some
interesting talks at the 2007 APS convention that should be good reads
for your students. [10/13/07]
quest for romance - An interesting essay in the Feb. 2007 issue
of the APS Observer summarizes some research. [added
does new love look like? - a New York Times article describing
some research in which brain scans were conducted of newly-in-love
individuals while they were looking at pictures of their beloved [added
of Americans have had pre-marital sex - An extensive review of
data from the Guttmacher Institute finds that "by age 20, 77% of respondents
had had sex, 75% had had premarital sex, and 12% had married; by age44,
95% of respondents (94% of women, 96% of men, and 97% of those who
had ever had sex) had had premarital sex. Even among those who abstained
until at least age 20, 81% had had premarital sex by age 44. Among
cohorts of women turning 15 between 1964 and 1993, at least 91% had
had premarital sex by age 30. Among those turning 15 between 1954
and 1963, 82% had had premarital sex by age 30, and 88% had done so
by age 44." [added 12/30/06]
- Confused about how MySpace and other social networking sites work?
Here's one explanation of MySpace from the How Stuff Works web site.
in America" - The first report is a
summary of survey data of young singles collected by the Pew Research
Center. [added 7/6/06]
in relationships - "Alcohol problems in intimate relationships:
Identification and intervention" is a guide from the National Institute
on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. [added 1/8/06]
science of love: BBC
- two different sites addressing this question [added
orientation - research site by authors
Behavior Transformed With One New Gene" - report from ScienceDaily
- Whoa! This is a cool site. Created by a couple researchers, this
site provides access to a lot of studies readers can participate
in, cool demos in which you can average different faces or transform
faces by criterion such as age, and more. Here
are the results of one of the researchers' studies in which they
created an average woman's face for every country. Here
is a story about this research. H/T to Marianne Miserandino. [added
of the titans: Familiarity vs. Averageness - It's cool when
researchers come up with ways to pit two powerful phenomena against
each other. Who wins this cage match? [added 8/5/13]
U.K.'s most beautiful female face? - [added
determines female facial beauty? - A "new golden ratio" is purportedly
found in this study: "Female faces were judged more attractive when
the vertical distance between their eyes and the mouth was approximately
36 percent of the face's length, and the horizontal distance between
their eyes was approximately 46 percent of the face's width. Interestingly,
these proportions correspond with those of an average face." [added
databases - If you are doing research on faces, or want to use
the stimuli for other purposes [added 1/18/10]
or without makeup - Marianne Miserandino passed along this interesting
reminder of how carefully the famous and beautiful guard the perception
of their beauty. The French version of Elle magazine has released
covers of famous stars with and without makeup. [added
versus averageness - A summary of some good research continuing
to look at these two factors in our perception of attractiveness
-- the question addressed here is, how do you tease out these two
factors independently? [added 7/11/09]
it really impossible to ignore an attractive face?" - [added
the next president have asymmetrical eyebrows? - amusing article
from The Onion [added
Face of Tomorrow - Very interesting site in which a photographer
creates a composite photo from many faces he has taken in a certain
community. He claims that the composite photo may represent what
people in that community will look like in the future -- the face
of tomorrow. [added 12/1/04]
students get better grades - Unfortunately this article confuses
correlation and causation, but the results are interesting. [added
some skin and others will think... - some significant and surprising
things about you. Read about the interesting studies. [added
beer goggles effect - Do people appear more attractive after you
have been drinking? Do you think you are more attractive? [added
you more or less attractive than you think? - This blog entry
describes a clever way of finding out, and the answer is..... [added
pickup lines work? - It depends! If the man is attractive and
the woman is looking for a short-term relationship, the type of line
didn't matter. But for a long-term relationship, women preferred direct
and innocuous lines over cute or flippant lines. Men who use the more
direct and innocuous lines are perceived as more trustworthy and intelligent.
What do they mean by a cute pickup line? See here.
men prefer butts or boobs? - I'm not going to say "It depends."
I'm not going to say anything. I'll just let you read the research.
do women prefer.... - a full beard, heavy stubble, light stubble,
or a cleanly shaven face? [added 8/5/13]
he can just carry around a guitar case - very interesting study
and attractiveness - If you were asked which two items (from chocolate,
hair spray, or a plastic bag) you would take to a deserted island
and explain why, would you give a humorous response? Would that make
you more attractive? [added 8/5/13]
attractiveness, personality, and values - Sam Sommers reviews
research finding that we believe physically attractive individuals
are more conscientious, extraverted, and open to experience. Not true.
However, the researchers found that physically attractive people did
differ in their values. Specifically, they were more traditional and
conformed more to societal expectations. [added 1/12/13]
in red seen as more sexually interested - "To understand why,
Pazda and his colleagues conducted a simple experiment. They showed
25 men a photo of a single woman doctored to look, in different cases,
like she was wearing either a red or white T-shirt. The researchers
then asked the volunteers to gauge, on a scale from 1 to 9, how keen
the model seemed to be on romance. In other words, the men answered
the question: 'Is she interested in sex?' Men interpreted the red
outfit as a signal that the woman was indeed more open to sexual advances.
In fact, the guys tended to grade the woman's disposition to sex about
1 to 1.5 points higher when she was wearing a red rather than a white
tee, Pazda and colleagues report online this month in the Journal
of Experimental Social Psychology." [added
Depends on the context - Sam Sommers reviews some research that
suggests whether we find someone attractive is also tied to the context
in which we view that person. Hey, Sam, we get it: Situations Matter.
Why don't you just write a book or something? [added
downside of attractiveness - Same-sex others reviewing your job
application may respond more negatively to your attractiveness. Here's
another link on the topic. [added
and attraction - Sam Sommers provides a good summary of some research
on how we are attracted (and want to sit by) similar others.
boosts trust, and attractiveness in more masculine male faces
- Interesting study -- more masculine males can be seen as more dangerous.
But a shot of oxytocin up the nose caused both males and females to
view the more masculine males as more attractive. [added
rate happy men less attractive than proud men; opposite for women
- I'm embarrassed to say that male shame was even more attractive
than happy, smiling men to women. [added
is in the mind of the beholder" - a good article in the APS Observer
reviewing research on what we find attractive and the benefits of
medicalization of beauty - Using the new TV show, Bridalplasty,
in which brides-to-be compete for cosmetic surgery, this blog entry
explores how beauty, along with other phenomena, has become "medicalized."
of leg length - Yes, we've measured eye width, cheekbone height,
and all sorts of facial features in determining what we find attractive.
Now we learn that "male and female silhouettes with short and excessively
long legs were perceived as less attractive across all nations." [added
Disney characters promote "beauty is good" stereotype? - abstract
of article that suggests they just might [added
we attracted to our relatives (and ourselves)? - Here is an interesting
blog entry describing research suggesting that we are attracted to
faces that look like ours and our relatives, perhaps suggesting that
an incest taboo is "necessary" for that reason. [added
Men on top, women on the bottom
- "If you're hoping to increase your online appeal to the opposite
sex, you might want to consider where on the screen you place your
photo. A study that's in press at Social Cognition has shown that
women rate men's photos as more attractive when they're placed near
the top of the screen. By contrast, men rate women's photos as more
attractive when they're located near the bottom of the screen." [added
"Importance of attractiveness
depends on where you live" - Urban? It matters. Rural? Not so
much. [added 1/18/10]
unwanted kiss from a moral man" - This study asks would you rather
receive an unwanted kiss from a moral man or a consensual kiss from
an immoral one. [added 1/18/10]
dig men in flashy cars" - "Previous studies have shown that male
attractiveness can be enhanced by manipulation of status through,
for example, the medium of costume. The present study experimentally
manipulated status by seating the same target model (male and female
matched for attractiveness) expressing identical facial expressions
and posture in either a 'high status' (Silver Bentley Continental
GT) or a 'neutral status' (Red Ford Fiesta ST) motor-car." [added
Boyle - Lots of good social psych in the Susan Boyle story. If
you are not familiar with it read the above. More here.
voices most attractive - [added 10/11/08]
girl mimed Olympics ceremony song - You may have heard about this
-- the young girl who sang a song as part of the Olympics was not
deemed attractive enough to be on display, so a more attractive girl
replaced her on stage and mimed the song.
and physical attractiveness - description of research in which
the manipulation of personality influenced the perception of physical
attractiveness [added 3/21/08]
there a "beauty premium" on TV game shows? - interesting study
girl killed: Nation unshaken by not-so-tragic death" - An amusing
article from the satirical online newspaper The Onion [added
in the election process - a study "The looks of a winner: Beauty,
gender, and electoral success" looks at the role of attractiveness
in Finland's politics. [added 12/30/06]
Symmetry Project - This is a very interesting project in which
researchers "focus on the possibility that dancing ability may correlate
with the dancer's degree of bodily symmetry, commonly used in evolutionary
studies to measure developmental stability and hence genetic quality."
Read what they found, and watch some of the dance video as well. Also
read a related research
article published in Nature. [added 2/22/06]
is sexy? - A columnist notes that U.S. Patrick Fitzgerald showed
up on a sexiest man list despite lacking "conventional" physically
attractive traits. The columnist asks, "Is there a female equivalent
to a 'sexy' Patrick Fitzgerald?" In other words, it raises the question
of differences between what men and women find attractive. [added
women rate other women as uglier" - interesting article describing
research about possible hormonal influences on attractiveness ratings
Books, and Book Chapters (available online)
K., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Methods
of assessing adult attachment: Do they converge? In
J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory
and close relationships (pp. 25-45). New York: Guilford
K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report
measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative
overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.),
Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76).
New York: Guilford Press.
Finkel, E. J., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (in press). The
effects of social relationships on self-regulation.
In K. D. Vohs, & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook
of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications
(2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. (in press). The
effects of self-regulation on social relationships.
In K. D. Vohs, & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook
of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications
(2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. (in press). Outsourcing
effort to close others. In L. Campbell, J. La Guardia,
J. Olsen, & M. Zanna (Eds.), The 12th Ontario symposium:
The Science of the Couple. Psychology Press: Philadelphia.
H. J., & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Attachment
processes and commitment to romantic relationships.
In J. M. Adams & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of
interpersonal commitment and relationship stability
(pp. 109-124). New York: Plenum.
W. B., Jr., Chang-Schneider, C., & Angulo, S. (2007).
in relationships as an adaptive process. In J. Wood,
A. Tesser & J. Holmes (Eds.) Self and Relationships,
Psychology Press: New York.
D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive
interdependence in close relationships. In W. J. Ickes
(Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships
(pp. 253-276). New York: Springer-Verlag.
D. M. & Lane, J. D. (1994). Secret
relationships: The back alley to love. In R. Erber &
R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal
relationships (pp. 67-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
D. M., & Lane, J. D. (1995). From
secrecy to psychopathology. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.),
Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 25-46). Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association.
Acevedo, B. P., & Aron, A. (2009). Does
a long-term relationship kill romantic love? Review
of General Psychology, 13, 59-65.
I., Shaver, P. R. & Yarnoz, S. (2002). Insecure
attachment, gender roles, and interpersonal dependency in
the Basque country. Personal Relationships, 9,
C., Zebrowitz, L.A., & Lachman, M.E. (2001). Physical
appearance and control beliefs in young, middle-aged, and
older adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
C. L., Feinberg, D. R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Voice
pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers.
Biology Letters, 3, 682-684.
M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2008). Becoming
friends by chance. Psychological Science, 19,
439-440. [added 7/29/08]
K.F., Beauchaine, T.P., Rothblum, E.D. & Solomon, S.E.
follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont,
same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married
couples. Developmental Psychology, 44, 102-116.
R. F., & Vohs, Kathleen, D.(2004). Sexual
Economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in
heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 8, 339-363. [added
P. S., Moody, J., & Stovel, K. (2004). Chains
of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual
networks. American Journal of Sociology, 110,
44-91. [added 3/3/05] (See also university
release about article.)
A., & Buss, D.M. (2000). Can
men and women just be friends? Personal Relationships,
A.L., & Buss, D.M. (2001). Opposite
sex friendship: Sex differences and similarities in initiation,
selection, and dissolution. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1310-1323.
A., & Buss, D.M. (2006). Sexual
strategies pursued and mate attraction tactics deployed.
Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1299-1311.
J. K., Johnson, A. B., Niederhoffer, K. & Swann, W.
B. Jr. (2006). Interpersonal
chemistry through negativity: Bonding by sharing negative
attitudes about others. Personal Relationships,
M., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality
and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and
marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65,
D. M. (1991). Conflict
in married couples: Personality predictors of anger and
upset. Journal of Personality, 59, 663-703.
D. M. (1992). Manipulation
in close relationships: The five factor model of personality
in interactional context. Journal of Personality,
D. M. (1994). The
strategies of human mating. American Scientist,
D.M. (1996). Paternity
uncertainty and the complex repertoire of human mating strategies.
American Psychologist, 51, 161-162.
D.M. (1998). Sexual
Strategies Theory: Historical origins and current status.
Journal of Sex Research, 34, 19-31.
D.M. (2003). Sexual
strategies: A journey into controversy. Psychological
Inquiry, 14, 217-224.
D.M. (2006). Sexual
selection and human mating strategies (letter to the editor).
Science, 312, 690-691.
D.M. (2006). Strategies
of human mating. Psychological Topics, 15,
D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor,
A., Bruchon Schweitzer, M [& 45 additional authors].
preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 societies.
Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47.
D.M. & Dedden, L.A. (1990). Derogation
of competitors. Journal of Social & Personal
Relationships, 7, 395-422.
D.M., & Haselton, M.G. (2005). The
evolution of jealousy. Trends in Cognitive Science,
D.M. Larsen, R.J., & Westin, D. (1996). Sex
differences in jealousy: Not gone, not forgotten, and not
explained by alternative hypotheses. Psychological
Science, 7, 373-375.
D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992).
differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology.
Psychological Science, 3, 251-255.
D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual
Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human
mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
D.M. & Schmitt, D.P. (1996). Strategic
self-promotion and competition derogation: Sex and conflict
effects on perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,
D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (1997). From
vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married
couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
D.M., Shackelford, T.K. (1997). Susceptibility
to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal
of Research in Personality, 31, 193-221.
D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (2008). Attractive
women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting
proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary
Psychology, 6, 134-146.
D.M., Shackelford, T.K., Chloe, J., Buunk, B.P., & Dijkstra,
P. (2000). Distress
about mating rivals. Personal Relationships, 7,
D.M., Shackelford, T.K., Kirkpatrick, L.A., Chloe, J., Hasegawa,
M., Hasegawa, T., & Bennett, K. (1999). Jealousy
and beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses
in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal
Relationships, 6, 125-150.
D.M., & Shackelford, T.K., Kirkpatrick, L.A, Larsen,
R.J. (2001). A
half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution
of values. Journal of Marriage and Families, 63,
D. M., Shackelford, T. K. & LeBlanc, G. J. (2000). Number
of children desired and preferred spousal age difference:
context-specific mate preference patterns across 37 cultures.
Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 323-331.
D.M., Shackelford, T.K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The
Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form (MRI-SF). Personality
and Individual Differences, 44, 322-334.
B.P., Angleitner, A., Obaid, V., & Buss, D.M. (1996).
differences in Jealousy in Evolutionary and Cultural Perspective:
Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States.
Psychological Science, 7, 359-363.
La Ronde, C. & Swann, W. B. Jr. (1998). Partner
verification: Restoring shattered images of our intimates.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,
Vries, M., Holland, R., Chenier, T., Starr, M., & Winkielman,
P. (2010). Happiness
cools the warm glow of familiarity: Psychophysiological
evidence that mood modulates the familiarity-affect link.
Psychological Science, 21, 321-328.
G., Freitas, A.L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, J. (1998).
self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 545-560.
Dunn, E. W., Huntsinger, J., Lun, J., Sinclair, S. (2008).
gift of similarity: How good and bad gifts influence relationships.
Social Cognition, 26, 469-481.
P., Finkel, E. J., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2007).
vs. unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is
created equal. Psychological Science, 18,
E. J., Burnette, J. L., & Scissors, L. E. (2007). Vengefully
ever after: Destiny beliefs, state attachment anxiety, and
forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
E. J., & Eastwick, P. W. (2009). Arbitrary
social norms influence sex differences in romantic selectivity.
Psychological Science, 20, 1290-1295.
E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., &
Sprecher, S. (2012). Online
dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological
science. Psychological Science In The Public Interest,
E. J., Eastwick P. W. , & Matthews. (2007). Speed
dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction:
A methodological primer. Personal Relationships,
G. M. & Bargh, J. A. (2003). Thinking
of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated
with relationship partners. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 84, 148-164.
Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). Outsourcing
self-regulation. Psychological Science, 22, 369-375.
R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult
romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging
controversies, and unanswered questions. Review
of General Psychology, 4, 132-154.
R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Airport
separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics
in separating couples. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 75, 1198-1212.
J. R., & Shaver, P. R. (2002). Respect
in close relationships: Prototype definition, self-report
assessment, and initial correlates. Personal Relationships,
S.W., Haselton, M.G., & Buss, D.M. (2006). Evolutionary
foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate
preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75-95.
A., & Buss, D. M. (1994). Tactics
for promoting sexual encounters. The Journal of
Sex Research, 5, 185-201.
H., Buss, D.M. (2000). Women's
Sexual Strategies: The hidden dimension of extra pair mating.
Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929-963.
M.G., & Buss, D.M. (2000). Error
management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex
mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 78, 81-91.
M., Buss, D.M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005).
lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception
between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin 31, 3-23.
Haselton, M.G., & Gildersleeve, K. (2011). Can
men detect ovulation? Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 20, 87-92.
J. V., Hoffman, E. Z., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The
distributed human neural system for face perception.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-233.
C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic
love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The
mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual
and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and
women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
S. E. & Reeve, H. K. (2004). Mating
Games: the Evolution of Human Mating Transactions. Behavioral
Ecology, 15, 748-756.
H., & Semin, G. (2009). The
thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity
on temperature. Psychological Science, 20,
M. E., Slatcher, R. B., Eastwick, P. W., Scissors, L. E.,
Finkel, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (in press). Language
style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability.
T. A., Hurst, C., & Simon, L. S. (2009). Does
it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)?
Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness,
core self-evaluations, and income. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 94, 742-755.
S.M., Zebrowitz, L.A., Langlois, J.H., & Johnson, R.M.
human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal
data on an evolutionary question. Psychological Science,
LaBrie, J., Cail, J., Hummer, J. F., & Lac, A. (2009).
men want: The role of reflective opposite-sex normative
preferences in alcohol use among college women. Psychology
of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 157-162.
S. W. S., Schwartz, N., Taubman, D., & Hou, M. (2010).
in times of a flu pandemic: Public sneezing increases perception
of unrelated risks and shifts preferences for federal spending.
Psychological Science, 21, 375-377.
K. N., Blatt, S. J., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Attachment
styles and parental representations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 407-419.
S.R., Freitas, A.L., & Salovey, P. (2002). Construing
action abstractly and blurring social distinctions: Implications
for perceiving homogeneity among, but also empathizing with
and helping, others. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 83, 1224-1238.
Lieberman, D., Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G.
affiliation across the ovulatory cycle: Females avoid fathers
when fertile. Psychological Science.
J., Menzies-Toman, D.A., Burton, K., & Bell, C. (2008).
contingencies and the differential effects of the availability
of an attractive alternative on relationship maintenance
for men and women. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 95, 50-65.
D.T. & Tellegen, A. (1993). Is
human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice?
A twin study of mate selection. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 65, 56-68.
J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, M. T.
vigilance: The implicit cognition of romantic rivalry.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97,
S. E., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (1994). Identity
negotiation in roommate relationships: The self as architect
and consequence of social reality. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 67, 1012-1023.
C.M. & Buss, D.M. (2007). Why
humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36,
M., Frost, J., & Ariely, D. (2007). Less
is more: The lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds
contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
O., deHaan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Is
face processing species-specific during the first year of
life? Science, 296, 1321-1323.
C. & Buss, D. M. (2008). Breaking
up romantic relationships: Costs experienced and coping
strategies deployed. Evolutionary Psychology, 6,
C., Fleischman, D.S. & Buss, D. M. (2008). The
daughter-guarding hypothesis: Parental influence on, and
emotional reactions to, offspring's mating behavior.
Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 217-233.
E.G., Haselton, M.G., & Buss, D.M. (2004). Ovulatory
shifts in female sexual desire. Journal of Sex Research,
S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2009).
ability to judge the romantic interest of others. Psychological
Science, 20, p. 22-26.
Platek, S. M., & Singh, D. (2010). Optimal
waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers
in men. PLoS ONE 5, e9042.
G., Zebrowitz, L. A., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower,
A., & McKay, R. (2001). Do
facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution
and Human Behavior, 22, 31-46.
G. I., Clausell, E., Holland, A., Fortuna, K., & Elieff,
C. (2008). Adult
romantic relationships as contexts of human development:
A multimethod comparison of same-sex couples with opposite-sex
dating, engaged, and married dyads. Developmental
Psychology, 44, 91-101.
B. (2002). Is
sex categorization from faces really parallel to face
Recognition? Visual Cognition, 9, 1003-1020.
D. P., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Mate
attraction and competitor derogation: Context effects
on perceived effectiveness. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 70, 1185-1204.
D.P., & Buss, D.M. (2001). Human
mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating
existing relationships. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 80, 894-917.
D. P., Shackelford, T. K. & Buss, D. M. (2001). Are
men really more 'oriented' toward short-term mating than
women? A critical review of theory and research. Psychology,
Evolution & Gender, 3, 211-239.
D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W. &
Buss, D. M. (2001). The
desire for sexual variety as a key to understanding basic
human mating strategies. Personal Relationships,
D.P, Shackelford, T.K., Duntley, J. D., Tooke, W., Buss,
D.M., Fisher, M.L., Lavallee, M., & Vasey, P. (2002).
there an early-30's peak in female sexual desire? Cross-sectional
evidence from the United States and Canada. The
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 1-18.
T.K. & Buss, D. M. (1996). Betrayal
in mateships, friendships and coalitions. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1151-1164.
T.K., Buss, D.M. (1997). Spousal
esteem. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 478-488.
T.K. & Buss, D.M. (1997). Cues
to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 23, 1034-1045.
T. K. & Buss, D. M. (2000). Marital
satisfaction and spousal cost-infliction. Personality
and Individual Differences, 28, 917-928.
T.K., Buss, D.M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness
or Breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partner's
infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 299-307.
T.K., Goetz, A.T. & Buss, D.M. (2005). Mate
retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability
of the Mate Retention Inventory. Personality and
Individual Differences, 39, 415-425.
T. K., Goetz, A. T., Buss, D. M., Euler, H. A., &
Hoier, S. (2005). When
we hurt the ones we love: Predicting violence against
women from men's mate retention tactics. Personal
Relationships, 12, 447-463.
T. K., Schmitt, D.P. & Buss, D. M. (2005). Mate
preferences of married persons in the newlywed year and
three years later. Cognition and Emotion, 19,
T. K., Schmitt, D.P. & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal
dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality
and Individual Differences, 39, 447-458.
T.K., Voracek, M., Schmitt, D.P., Buss, D.M., Weekes-Shackelford,
V.A., Michalski, R.L. (2004). Romantic
jealousy in early adulthood and in later life. Human
Nature, 15, 283-300.
E.A., Shackelford, T.K. & Buss, D.M. (2007). Sex
ratio and mate preferences: A cross-cultural investigation.
European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 288-296.
E.A., Shackelford, T.K. & Buss, D.M. (2008). Socioeconomic
development and shifts in mate preferences. Evolutionary
Psychology, 6, 447-455.
W. B., Jr., De La Ronde, C. & Hixon, J. G. (1994).
and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,
W. B., Jr. & Gill, M.J. (1997). Confidence
and accuracy in person perception: Do we know what we
think we know about our relationship partners? Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 747-757.
W. B., Jr., Hixon, J. G., & De La Ronde, C. (1992).
the bitter truth: Negative self-concepts and marital commitment.
Psychological Science, 3, 118-121.
W. B., Jr., McClarty, K., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2007).
from the storm? Flawed reactions to stress in precarious
couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
W. B., Jr., & Predmore, S. C. (1985). Intimates
as agents of social support: Sources of consolation or
despair? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
W. B. Jr. & Rentfrow, P. J. (2001). Blirtatiousness:
Cognitive, behavioral, and physiological consequences
of rapid responding. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology. 6, 1160-1175.
W. B., Jr., Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2003).
precarious couple effect: Verbally inhibited men + critical,
disinhibited women = bad chemistry. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1095-1106.
W. B., Jr., Sellars, J. S., & McClarty, K. M. (2006).
today, troubling tomorrow: The roots of the precarious
couple effect. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 32, 93-103.
W. B., Jr., Silvera, D. H., & Proske, C. U. (1995).
"knowing your partner": Dangerous illusions in the age
of AIDS? Personal Relationships, 2, 173-186.
Thompson, E., & Hampton, J. (2011). The
effect of relationship status on communicating emotions
through touch. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 295-306.
den Bergh, B., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2008). Bikinis
instigate generalized impatience in intertemporal choice.
Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 85-97.
Hooff, J. C., Crawford, H., & Van Vugt, M. (2010).
wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences
in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive
memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.
D. M., & Gold, D. B. (1995). Fanning
old flames: Emotional and cognitive effects of suppressing
thoughts of a past relationship. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 68, 782-792.
D. M., Lane, J. D., & Dimitri, S. (1994). The
allure of secret relationships. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 66, 287-300.
W.B., Nock, S.L. (2006). What's
love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and
women's marital quality. Social Forces, Vol.84,
No. 2, 1321-1345. [added 4/6/06]
L.A., Fellous, J.M., Mignault, A. & Andreoletti, C.
impressions as overgeneralized responses to adaptively
significant facial qualities: Evidence from connectionist
modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
L.A., Hall, J.A., Murphy, N.A., & Rhodes, G. (2002).
smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and
their origins. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 28, 238-249.
L.A., Andreoletti, C., Collins, M.A., Lee, S.Y., &
Blumenthal, J. (1998). Bright,
bad, babyfaced boys: Appearance stereotypes do not always
yield self-fulfilling prophecy effects. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1300-1320.
L.A., & Collins, M.A. (1997). Accurate
social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances
of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 1, 203-222.
2000-2013. This site was created and is maintained by Jon
Mueller, Professor of Psychology at North
Central College, Naperville, IL. Send comments to Jon.